有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【一】
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【二】
今天，到酒店吃饭，一进门就看到玻璃窗里摆着一块白色的东西，我问我的爸爸那是什么？我的爸爸说是白鲨鳍，也就是大鲨鱼的翅。
一提起鲨鱼，我就想到鱼肝油和宴席上的鱼翅汤，还有电影里的大白鲨，要不就是被吃的形象，要不就是吃人的形象。
可我的爸爸告诉我，鲨鱼在不久将来就会从海洋深处消失，很可能会成为因为人类因素而第一个绝迹的海洋生物。
为什么鲨鱼会第一个绝迹呢？因为每年人类掉的鲨鱼数量高达550万只，而真正数量可能还不止这么多。在我们国家，吃鱼翅代表着财富和尊贵，随着人们收入的增加，人们对鱼翅的需求也越来越多，对捕鱼的人来说也是一笔很大的收入。可是，让人难过的`是，渔船捕捉到鲨鱼后，因为鲨鱼很大，占据了船舱，而且吃鲨鱼肉的人很少，所以船员只把鱼翅割下来，就把剩下的鲨鱼放回海里，没有鱼翅的鲨鱼不久就掉了。
另一个严重的问题是，鲨鱼成熟晚，生小鲨鱼的数量少，而且成长速度慢，大约十年才能长成一条成年的鲨鱼。好不容易长大的鲨鱼，却因为鱼翅而失去了性命，所以鲨鱼越来越少了。
那，没有鲨鱼有什么问题呢？我的爸爸告诉我，大自然的生物链是一个紧密相连的系统，如果我们从生物链的一个环里取出一个物种，其他海洋生物就都跟着灭绝了，所以现在很多国家的动物保护学家都提出要保护鲨鱼。保护鲨鱼是一个很新的概念，它不像保护海豚和保护鲸鱼那么容易被人接受，因为人们都认为鲨鱼很大，很凶恶，很喜欢吃比它小的动物，喜欢吃人。事实上，大多数的鲨鱼，很少超过两米，而且，最大的鲨鱼――鲸鲨主要吃虾蟹。了解了这些信息，下次再看见桌上的鱼翅，我们是不是该好好重新考虑一下，有没有必要为了一时想吃鱼翅，让一个珍贵的物种从地球上消失呢？
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【三】
“呜，呜，呜”，听，在不远处有一条小河在哭。
我问它：“你为什么要哭呀?”小河抽抽搭搭的回答：“我原来清清的河水流向四面八方，不管谁看见了都称赞。可是，可是现在……”
“无风时，我犹如一面大镜子，清澈见底，游人连我怀中的鹅卵石都能数清;起风了，我身中那顽皮的浪花一漾一漾，发出‘哗啦哗啦”的声音 ;夏天，水中的荷花一朵朵，有淡红的、乳白的、嫩乎乎的、水灵灵的，像喝醉了酒似的，在风中东悠西荡，多逗人!那伞似的荷叶，绿绿的，给我当帽子戴;那水中的鱼儿欢快的追逐着、嬉闹着、不时交头接耳，窃窃私语，一群群孩子拥入我的'怀抱，久久地，久久地不愿离去。看着孩子们快乐的玩耍，我拥抱着他们，抚摸着他们，多快活呀!
昔日的荷花不见了。人们不停的向我身体里扔垃圾，泼污水……
人们见了我，都捂着鼻子，说：’真脏，真臭，恶心了!‘’这里的鱼虾都绝种了‘，听着他们的议论，再看看我的身体，我多难过呀!“
听了小河的话，我深感触动，很惭愧，我发自内心的说：”保护我们的家园吧，不要再让小河哭泣了，这是我们共同的家园!“
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【四】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【五】
我是一只小小鸟，我住在沙漠的边缘，我搬过了许多次家，可我才两岁。
原来，我住在一个非常大的森林，那里绿树成荫，环境优美，食物丰盛。我和我的同伴们都在那里幸福、快乐的生活着。可是，有一天，有一群人类来到了我们的家园，打破了我们在那里的宁静生活，他们一个个拿着电踞把我们森林里的大树一颗颗的锯掉。大树倒了，巢毀了，就连我们鸟儿也了许多，幸好我跑得快，可是，我不能住在这天堂般的家园了。
后来，我飞呀飞，飞呀飞，却无论如何也找不到一棵树，终于，我在人类的小区里找到了一些小树。于是，我在那里安了家。那里虽然没有我的同类，但是，我终于有了自己的家了。寂寞时，只能唱几首歌，希望自己的同伴听到歌声来找我。可是，好景不长，那里的人们都非常讨厌我，他们说：”这只鸟真吵，我们一定要把它赶走。“于是，小孩们用弹弓射我，大人们用石头砸我，我被弹弓射伤了一条腿，还有一个小孩爬上树，把我的巢毀了。于是，我只好离开了这里。
我再次飞呀飞，飞呀飞，飞到了一条小河边，这条小河的水全都黑了，只有一棵半不活的小树，我只能在这里又住了下来。可是没过多久，我又搬家了。因为我在这里儿生存不下去了，这里的草、水都有毒。有一天我就食物中毒了，幸好，一场雨把我救活了。
最后，我飞到了一个大沙漠的边缘，这里虽烈日炎炎，但是，这里还是可以安家的。
有时候，我在想：人类还会来这儿吗?那我到底要到哪儿安家呢?我们什么时候才有自己的家啊!
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【六】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【七】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
有关环境保护的大学英文作文150词【八】
今天，到酒店吃饭，一进门就看到玻璃窗里摆着一块白色的东西，我问我的爸爸那是什么？我的爸爸说是白鲨鳍，也就是大鲨鱼的翅。
一提起鲨鱼，我就想到鱼肝油和宴席上的鱼翅汤，还有电影里的大白鲨，要不就是被吃的形象，要不就是吃人的形象。
可我的爸爸告诉我，鲨鱼在不久将来就会从海洋深处消失，很可能会成为因为人类因素而第一个绝迹的海洋生物。
为什么鲨鱼会第一个绝迹呢？因为每年人类掉的鲨鱼数量高达550万只，而真正数量可能还不止这么多。在我们国家，吃鱼翅代表着财富和尊贵，随着人们收入的增加，人们对鱼翅的需求也越来越多，对捕鱼的人来说也是一笔很大的收入。可是，让人难过的是，渔船捕捉到鲨鱼后，因为鲨鱼很大，占据了船舱，而且吃鲨鱼肉的人很少，所以船员只把鱼翅割下来，就把剩下的鲨鱼放回海里，没有鱼翅的鲨鱼不久就掉了。
另一个严重的问题是，鲨鱼成熟晚，生小鲨鱼的数量少，而且成长速度慢，大约十年才能长成一条成年的鲨鱼。好不容易长大的鲨鱼，却因为鱼翅而失去了性命，所以鲨鱼越来越少了。
那，没有鲨鱼有什么问题呢？我的爸爸告诉我，大自然的生物链是一个紧密相连的系统，如果我们从生物链的一个环里取出一个物种，其他海洋生物就都跟着灭绝了，所以现在很多国家的动物保护学家都提出要保护鲨鱼。保护鲨鱼是一个很新的概念，它不像保护海豚和保护鲸鱼那么容易被人接受，因为人们都认为鲨鱼很大，很凶恶，很喜欢吃比它小的动物，喜欢吃人。事实上，大多数的鲨鱼，很少超过两米，而且，最大的'鲨鱼――鲸鲨主要吃虾蟹。了解了这些信息，下次再看见桌上的鱼翅，我们是不是该好好重新考虑一下，有没有必要为了一时想吃鱼翅，让一个珍贵的物种从地球上消失呢？
