关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【一】
（1）激励要从学生的实际出发。在运用激励时，对每一个学生不要持有偏见，做到公正公平，只对事不对人，不管他是优秀的学生还是普通的学生，另外还要注意激励的时机和次数也要尽量的去调控，尽量的去考虑学生的自尊心和自信心。
（2）激励要有具体的形式和目的。为什么要表扬，为什么要表扬这几个学生，这都是有目的的，这都是激励学生进步的有效手段。例如表扬学生在击球打棒练习时，就要明确指出学生哪些方面做得好，如挥棒的动作以及发力的顺序是否正确时。
如果只是用“好”、“真棒”等来表扬学生，被表扬的学生和其他同学都不明白究竟好在哪里，应该指出被表扬同学哪个动作“好”，“棒”在哪个方面，让动作不好的同学能通过老师的讲解真正的能知道自己不好动作和优秀同学动作的差距在什么地方，去模仿和改正，这样才能在上课的教学过程中起到很好的作用。除上述两种激励艺术外，还有其他众多激励艺术，这些激励艺术，常常是交叉运用的，由于每个学生的情况不同，教师应选择比较合理的激励艺术，并在垒球的教学过程中不断探索，掌握一定的体育运动知识与技术并形成相应的技能，实现战术训练与心理训练的相辅相成，促进垒球运动在我国的发展，让越来越多的人喜欢和从事这项运动。
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【二】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【三】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【四】
对于技术较好的学生，有了一定的进步以后，教师在表扬的同时，还应该让他们朝更高的目标去努力，这样兼顾了班级里面的两个极端，让每个人都有目标，每个人都会去努力的。二是教师的示范要具有感染性。在垒球教学中，学生直接感知的对象是教师，教师的情绪、心理品质及讲解、示范对学生情绪有极大的暗示性和感染力，起着潜移默化的作用。如教授一些较难的动作时，学生会产生恐惧心理，这时教师的示范动作如果很轻松优美、干净利落，可以消除学生紧张心理，激发学生跃跃欲试的积极情趣，使学生在知觉和意向中产生一种心理反射：欣赏—羡慕—向往—实践。情绪总是会传染的，当有好的情绪在学生中间的时候，那么成功离学生就会很近了。三是充当角色的激励。体育课应尽可能地应用竞赛和游戏的方式，在比赛中让每个同学体现自己的角色，发挥其团体精神，促进其情感的发泄和寄托，因此，参与者会尽自己最大的努力，去获得最大的胜利，这种感觉不是任何课上能感觉得到的，所以角色的扮演能增加学生的责任感和活跃课堂的气氛。四是结合教材内容，采用适宜的教法，激发学生的情感。教师要紧密结合教材内容经常对学生施以增强学习动作兴趣的种种影响，以改变他们的情感特性。
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【五】
当前，我们正面临百年未有之大变局、开启了全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程，机遇与挑战并存，困难与希望同在。一方面，青年干部必须要接好革命事业的“接力棒”，在党的奋斗史中提炼经验、启迪智慧、砥砺奋进，要学做老黄牛，发扬不在乎得失的奉献精神、兢兢业业的责任心，担起新时代开创的重任。另一方面，要以“正青春”的奋斗姿态和精神状态，努力学习，增长本领，积极作为，答好青春“担当之卷”，在民族复兴这场“接力赛”中，跑出属于青年一代的好成绩。广大科研工作者，应进一步弘扬航天精神，永攀科技高峰，走好新时代的长征路。
发扬“原得此生长报国”的爱国精神。在我国航天事业发展初期，许多功成名就、才华横溢的科学家放弃国外优厚的条件，义无反顾地回到祖国。许多研制工作者甘当无名英雄，隐姓埋名，默默奉献，有的甚至献出了宝贵的生命。他们用热和生命谱写了一部为祖国、为人民鞠躬尽瘁、而后已的动人诗篇。新时代的科研人才要向老一辈科学家学习，坚定科技创新、服务国家的思想，将对事业的追求融入国家的需要，继承前人爱国奉献的传统，以国家和民族需要为研究导向，在科学报国、科技强国的道路上，实现个人、事业、国家的完美融合。
发扬“千磨万击还坚劲”的奋斗精神。在茫茫无际的戈壁荒原，在人烟稀少的深山峡谷，风餐露宿，不辞辛劳，老一辈科研工作者们克服了各种难以想象的艰难险阻。他们运用有限的科研和试验手段，依靠科学，顽强拼搏，发奋图强，锐意创新，突破了一个个技术难关，取得了“两弹一星”事业的伟大胜利。身处这个时代，我们无疑是幸运的，不论是生活环境还是科研条件，都远比老一辈科学家不知要好多少。当代科研工作者以老一辈科学家为榜样，大力弘扬自力更生、艰苦奋斗的精神，在各自的领域脚踏实地、埋头苦干，创造出新的成绩。
发扬“众人拾柴火焰高”的团结精神。在研制“两弹一星”的不凡历程中，来自全国各地区、各部门成千上万的科学技术人员、工程技术人员、后勤保障人员团结协作、群策群力，汇成了向现代科技高峰进军的浩浩荡荡的队伍。他们用自己的辉煌业绩，为中华民族文明创造史增添了光彩夺目的'一页。科学研究是一项复杂、艰巨的群体劳动，在科研活动中人与人之间的相互作用直接影响着科研协作和科研计划的完成。广大科研工作者要牢固树立大局意识、协作意识、服务意识，盯紧共同的目标，在充分发挥各自特长的同时，做好相互配合。
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【六】
《天宫课堂》太空授课正式开始了，应该说，这是中国航天事业的壮举，它不仅标志着中国已经能够熟练的运用载人航天技术，也意味着我国的航天科学技术已经向教育领域再一次伸出了橄榄枝。
此次，中国航天员们在300公里的太空传递科学知识，并用各种太空实验向世人展示宇宙的魅力，更是激发了无数学生对神秘太空的兴趣。师者，传道授业解惑也。但是，用太空讲课的方式亲自传授科学知识，这也只能是人类现代史上才能完成的壮举。孔子当年杏林游学时又怎会想到有一天，他的后辈会像嫦娥一样奔向太空，并在太空上传道授业解惑呢?都说“教师是太阳底下最光辉的职业”，而摩根和王亚平却把这种职业的光辉洒向太空，让整个宇宙都沐浴在人性的光辉下。如果说浩瀚的宇宙是一本书籍的话，那么强大的综合国力、扎实的航天技术无疑是打开这本书的智慧钥匙。
中国航天员们的太空授课，已经为我们开启了神奇的太空之旅，他们发出的“中国好声音”也正在感染和感动着我们身边每一个人。然而，广袤太空的未知以及教育意义的深远也给中国的载人航天事业提出了更高的要求。要想从宇宙中汲取更多的营养，就必须大力发展载人航天和教育事业。而我们也期待此次太空历险记将我们带到更遥远的地方去，好让更多的地方都能够倾听到“中国好声音”。这次太空授课，激发了学生们对学习的内心喜爱，这样就可以转化为爱祖国、爱学习、爱科学的朴素情感，让我们在日常的工作中也少一些说教，多一些用心，激励培养我们未来的接班人。
关于体育课堂的英文作文大学【七】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
