英语基础差中式英语作文怎么办【一】
分层教学的理论基础“层次性原理”认为教学过程是师生交流的过程。交流可分为不同层次:元素层次(词语交流;命题层次(语句交流;模式层次(语句网络交流。师生的交流必须在同一层次下才能进行。不分层的常规教学中，教师必须兼顾到同一班级不同学生的需求和接受能力，这在一定程度上必然是以牺牲部分学生的学习积极性为代价的。并且当需求、接受能力、英语基础等影响因素过于多样性的时候，教师很难在课堂上达到兼顾，即在此种课堂中很难找到一种可供交流的同层次的语言。而分层教学较好的解决了这一问题。
20世纪80年代，美国著名应用语言学家克拉申在研究人的第一语言输入过程中提出了著名的“i+1”理论。这一理论认为，人类只有获得可理解性的语言输入，才能习得语言。这也就是说，人们只有在理解了语言的含义之后才可能习得这种语言，人们习得语言的唯一途径就是获得可理解性的语言输入。他用“i+1”来表示可理解的语言输入。“i”代表学习者的现有水平，“1”代表稍微超出学习者现有水平的语言知识。如果学习的内容远远超出学习者现有的水平，即输入的语言知识对于学习者来说是不可理解的，那么就会使学习的效果大打折扣。
英语基础差中式英语作文怎么办【二】
暑假里，妈妈为我买了一本《木偶奇遇记》，这本书可好看了，我爱不释手，一回到家，我就捧起书津津有味的读了起来。
故事中的主人公“皮诺曹”是一位叫“盖比特”的老爷爷用木头做出来的。他可以说话，可以走路，还能上学呢。“皮诺曹”和老爷爷相依为命，生活很快乐。
故事发生在“皮诺曹”的一次上学路上。他被“老狐狸”和“坏蛋猫”抓走了，卖给了马戏团老板。马戏团老板看到“皮诺曹”不同寻常，就让他为自己赚钱，为观众表演。随后，又把“皮诺曹”送到了欢乐谷。“欢乐谷”里没有大人，没有学校，“皮诺曹”在这里尽情的玩乐，尽情的吃喝，过的不亦乐乎。
可是，没过多久，“皮诺曹”的良心——哲明理来到的时候，欢乐谷里却变成了荒凉破败的世界，“皮诺曹”也变成了一头驴子。直到这时，“皮诺曹”十分后悔，他在街道垂头丧气的说：“我要不这样该多好啊，现在，我是一头丑陋的、令人厌恶的驴子！”
不久，“皮诺曹”收到了一封信，信中写到了“盖比特”老爷爷为了救“皮诺曹”，被鲸鱼吞到了肚子里，情况十分危险。为了救爷爷，“皮诺曹”毅然的跳进海里找鲸鱼，在鱼肚里，“皮诺曹”和“盖比特”老爷爷终于相聚了，为了逃出鱼肚，“皮诺曹”放弃了自己的生命，救出了老爷爷。读到这里，我眼睛湿润了。“皮诺曹”你真是一位男子汉，你的善良、诚实、勇敢给我留下了深刻的印象。看到这里，我真希望“皮诺曹”再活过来，再和喜欢他的老爷爷一起快快乐乐的生活……
“皮诺曹”的精神感动了蓝仙子，她不仅救活了“皮诺曹”，还利用魔法把他变成了有生命的、真正的人。
读完合上书，感觉自己也和“皮诺曹”一起经历了许许多多的'事，让我如梦如幻，身临其境。
英语基础差中式英语作文怎么办【三】
When I was a freshman in college I watched the film Gua Sha Treatment for the first time, now I am a junior student and I come back to review the movie from a multicultural aspect, I have many different feelings after watching the film again.
At the beginning of the film, XuDatong is given an award and later he delivers a speech. What makes me impressed most is in his speech he says “one day I will become one of you, a truly successful American, today this award proved that America is a true land of opportunity and I am the living proof of that.” At that moment Xu thinks he has realized his American Dream totally with his lovingly wife and adorable son. However, I think it is ironical that to make a speech like that and I assume it is made on purpose to hind a clue for the story's development. How many non—American people have such a beautiful American dream? One of my classmate studies in American now and before he went aboard he told me his American dream is he can stand at the top of the New York. To be honest, I also dream that one day I can get the Green Card living there happily and successfully maybe working at the Wall Street. When Xu gets the award he thinks he entirely melted in the melting pot neglecting the multicultural obstruct, later the plot goes against the way he thinks. And later Quinlan asked Xu'why you be the scapegoat of your father?' Xu answers 'because he is Chinese.' Then maybe Xu knows that there is always a wide gap between Chinese and American cultures.
The second scene is Xu hit his son Denis because Denis hit the son of xu's boss, at the middle of the film xu tells his boss that he hit his own son is only to show his respect to his boss John Quinlan, that time Quinlan feels puzzled “what a Chinese logic”,yes, American can never understand such a logic full of Chinese characteristic, because they respect everyone including the children, they won't beat a child to please the boss, and there is no such a conception of degree between employee and employer, they feel everyone is equal, which is quite different from china.
Connected to the second scene, the third difference I want to analyze is the care for the children. In America, people pay more attention to the right of children which can be seen from the law—leaving children alone at home is illegal, while in China it is so common that almost everyone may experience such loneliness. And Children Welfare Agency does work in America which shows the importance Americans attach to children's right. What's more, I remember a line 'No one won the case, especially the child.' In my opinion, it also manifests the universal concern from the American public to the children.
The fourth aspect is following the procedure, in the film, more than there times, the people focus on the rule, the law, the procedure. At the Christmas Eve Xu wants to return back to his home pretending as a Santa Claus, what a pity, the security recognizes him and persuades 'you are always a good tenement, never causes troubles for me.' And another scene is at the end of the film , the judge says 'I have to follow the procedure.' However, in China people always have to ask for a favor to do something, and later you have to pay back the favor,for myself, I prefer the American style, strict to the procedure.
The fifth and the last point is the humors, Quinlan says 'you can't fall, your health security is the company paid.' 'Datong, welcome home, maybe next time, you can come from the front door.' 'dady, why you come from the window' ' because we don't have a chimney.' I really adore this distinguished American humor, especially in dangerous situations, which is quite rare in China.
That's my whole reaction to Gua Sha Treatment.
英语基础差中式英语作文怎么办【四】
因为对于翻译这门手艺充满了憧憬，就买了一堆北外上外考研指定用书回家研究，中式英语之鉴就是其中一本，读完有些思考想跟大家唠唠。平卡姆老师在这本书中用的。英语不是很难，单词平均难度在专四和专八之间，过了专四或者六级的人看应该会比较有收获，在“学习区”内，所以推荐一下这本书。
作者写中式英语之鉴是为了纠正一些中国人运用英语时错误的不地道的表达，那么首先要回答的问题是什么是正宗的英语。
在这本书中所倡导的正宗的英语无疑指的是简明英语，特点是”direct， simple and clear”。下面是简明英语的起源（摘自百度）。
“简明英语是由查尔斯·凯·奥格登发明的只有少量单词的英语，他的书简明英语规则和语法的一般约定里对此有所描述。
奥格登说过：学习英语要七年，学习世界语要七个月，而学习简明英语只要七周。简明英语用于公司在国际上使用的书籍，短期内对学生进行基本英语教学。
奥格登不使用重复意义的单词，而且需要所有国家都适用这些单词。他利用大规模的测试和调整来得到这些词汇。在语法方面，他也做了简化，但是保留了英语通常的用法。”
在后面的发展中，简明英语在商务英语和法律英语上有了长足发展。简明英语无疑很适合用在商业上；而法律英语为了保证条款的确定性和权威性，一般冗长复杂，如一个含义要用两个甚至三个同义词来表示，在现在重视效率的社会渐渐向简明方向发展不足为奇。
但是这里我们要清楚一个语言是在不断成长和变化的，中古英语和现代英语自然是有诸多不同，而且每个人的风格也不同。在我看来简明英语的诸多规则只能算作是一种风格，一种在近代社会被提倡的风格。而我们在翻译或者写作时应依具体文本的需求和受众的需求适用不同的风格，而不是倡导每种文本都用一个风格。口语和书面语明显不同，书面语中，用途不同时风格也应做相应的改变。
比如文学和非文学就有很多区别，文学讲究陌生化，要得就是一种朦胧的，”transparent”的感觉，才能让自己的文字更引人遐想有更多解释空间，而非文学为了交流方便，自然不会太晦涩难懂。非文学中又可以分很多类，商务性文本、法律性文本、政治性文本。比如政治性文本，你的翻译是为了让英语国家的人明白，就要模仿英语国家中的政治性文本的写法。但翻译这种文本的一个困境是：译者害怕丢失一个词就丢失了一个意义，不敢随意添加修改，所以偏向直译。其实也是很无奈。
一个语言中什么说法能不能用要取决于大多数人是怎么说的，因为你的目的是让大多数受众明白。比如clinch现在虽然被认为是不符合语法，但有些时代中因为大家都这么说，所以当时是可以接受的。所以这种情况下，”non native speaker” 就很吃亏，因为没有大环境让你了解其他人都在怎么说。
我认为在这里，中式英语中最应该摒弃的无疑是you can you up这类说法。当然这个是有点太low了，相信有点英文素养的人都不会犯。接下来要摒弃的就是不常见说法，也就是本书中part one所强调要纠正的。然后对于part two中少用名词多用动词、少用被动多用主动这类型风格类的倾向，我认为就要依文本需求和受众需求来定了，如果一个文本十分正式，翻译的很直白自然也是不合适的。
