大学春天的英文作文【一】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
大学春天的英文作文【二】
春天不仅意味着万物复苏、姹紫嫣红，候鸟一路向南，它更是一个友好的季节，我们大可以欢天喜地，穿红戴绿。所以人们总是习惯用“春天”来形容美好，代替开始，讴歌希望。
一群叛逆的孩子，一个暴虐的校长，当他们遇见仁慈的校监，整个校园奇迹般地度过阴霾，迎来了春天。
校监马修善良而不失严谨。他懂得人的尊严，因而慈悲为怀。他是个不成功的音乐家，不苟言笑，然而却执着于音乐能使“坏小孩”转变，给人带去快乐。自然而然，同学们都成了小小合唱团的一员。每天的必修课就是唱歌。学着配合，学着使歌声美丽，学着安定。
孩子们由最初的五音不成调，到最后的自信与默契，这一变化是深谙音乐魔力的马修意料之中的事。正如我们不必过分担忧花苞是否绽放，权可以静待花香四溢。
春洗脱了冬的.冷傲和秋的惆怅，当早晨__点钟，太阳高挂，温暖便在心里静静流淌。人们会莫名地抬头仰望蓝天，并不是为了思念，而是一种祈祷或是感激。抑或只是单纯地停驻，去欣赏向来被遗忘的风景。简单使得春天拥有着可以高歌的权力。在孩子们的世界里，快乐显得纯粹。有歌声，微笑便装满胸膛。就像一场春雨后的彩虹，那样自然，又很可贵。
春天似乎有点短暂，来得静悄悄，去得也无影踪。徐志摩先生的那一脍炙人口的诗句———轻轻地我走了，正如我轻轻地来……原来也可以安放在“春天”。学校着火了，学生们安然无恙，这个像是故事的事故却导致了马修的离职。“我盼望着能看见孩子们涌到门口和我道别”，这是马修心底里卑微的愿望。可惜并没有。然而在路的转角，孩子们用他们引以为傲的清脆的歌声铺满了整条街，覆盖了临别时的忧愁。挥动的双手，是在道别，更像是无助的表达，也在宣告着，从此后要独自飞翔。
还在念着“冬天来了，春天还会远吗?”，一转眼，春天已掠过身旁。不经意地，我们竟看见小鸟欢唱、柳枝嫩绿、蝴蝶翩飞……
大学春天的英文作文【三】
一部好的电影总会给人们带来非同一般的震撼，给人非同一般的启发。让人久久不能忘记，它会在人的心里飘荡，如同放牛班在马修的带领下唱的那首《夜晚》，让人陶醉其中。
故事的开头是描写著名指挥家皮埃尔在一个夜晚，打开了自己小时候的音乐老师教他所在的放牛班时所写的日记，并回忆当时的故事。马修是一个失败的音乐家，在失去职业后被转到一个叫“池塘底部”的辅育院当代课老师。那是一个设备特别差的房子，怎么看都像监狱一般，不光外表像，连里面的.孩子们和老师都像是囚犯看守监狱的人。
里边全部都是一些问题儿童，马修面对的是悲伤难过的命运。孩子们的一个恶作剧就让教师麦神父出了意外，头部受了创伤，这件事让马修决定，要在这些孩子们心中树立威严，但他不想像其他教师一样，孩子一犯错就处罚，他认为应该给他们机会，让他们在爱中悔改，让他们感受世界的温暖，而不是恨。所以他觉得这些孩子不是无药可救，而是缺少教育。
一个问题儿童就很难管教，一群更是了不得。单单骂马修是秃子、王八就快让他气爆了，唯一让他忍耐的理由就是放牛班的每个孩子都有自己的梦想和他们隐藏在心里的慈爱。其实马修知道伤害麦神父的凶手，可他没有说出来，因为他相信这个孩子一定会悔改。马修刚开始对他们也不是很亲切，也比较严厉，但他从不体罚他们，一直一而三再而三地替他们向院长隐瞒错误。孩子们在慢慢的改变，让马修大吃一惊，但有一天夜晚，马修从孩子们的宿舍旁经过，听见他们唱：“秃头，你完蛋了！”他就笑了一下，从房间外面走了进来。那个孩子并没有注意到，所有人都安静了，只有他一个人唱，在安静的宿舍楼里声音特别响亮：“秃头，你……”他觉得不对劲，突然停下来，问：“同志们，你们怎么都安静了呢？”大家不回答，都看向他后面。他回头一看，马修已经走到身边，还没反应过来，马修笑着说：“唱得不错，可是跑掉调了。”然后他就一句一句地教那个孩子。教完以后他就走回自己的房间睡觉去了。
马修并没有睡，他心想他们歌唱得很好，虽然跑调了，既然这样，我们就组一个乐团吧。第二天晚上，马修在孩子们睡觉的时候独自一个人在房间写乐谱。第三天早上，他来到教室，对孩子们说，他要班级里的每个人都唱一首歌。每个孩子在他面前唱了一首歌以后，便分配了他们的高、低声部，就这样开始了音乐教学。
但这个学校的校长恰好与马修这位爱音乐的人相反，校长特别讨厌音乐，只顾自己的前途，从不为学校里这60位学生着想，从不支持孩子们学音乐。他很不想听到孩子们唱歌，就下令不允许唱歌。男生们来到校长办公室，请求校长允许他们唱歌，而且邀请校长参加唱歌比赛，展示体育课上唱的歌，但校长还是很讨厌听到歌声，于是他把马修叫到办公室，要求立刻停止唱歌。可是马修不为所动，还是坚持，最后校长忍无可忍，把马修开除了。但是这首歌被永久地流传了下来，至今传唱。
开始时我并没有看懂，有点儿漫不经心，迷惑不解，可看完时我却感慨万分，感动不已。我认为马修是一个有想法，而且能够坚持完成梦想的人。虽然校长否定他，孩子们当初也不理解他，觉得他就是一个普通的学监，但是他仍然坚持着，当孩子们一次次犯错时却一次次地用爱心去接纳他们。每个人都会犯错，只要去宽容他、帮助他，他才会知道错误，下次才不敢做，不能动不动就惩罚，这样虽然能让他害怕，但是会伤害他的心灵，会让孩子变得更孤僻。
我们也应该像他一样，拥有永不放弃、坚持不懈的精神。
大学春天的英文作文【四】
大学春天的英文作文【五】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
大学春天的英文作文【六】
春天不仅意味着万物复苏、姹紫嫣红，候鸟一路向南，它更是一个友好的季节，我们大可以欢天喜地，穿红戴绿。所以人们总是习惯用“春天”来形容美好，代替开始，讴歌希望。
一群叛逆的孩子，一个暴虐的校长，当他们遇见仁慈的校监，整个校园奇迹般地度过阴霾，迎来了春天。
校监马修善良而不失严谨。他懂得人的尊严，因而慈悲为怀。他是个不成功的音乐家，不苟言笑，然而却执着于音乐能使“坏小孩”转变，给人带去快乐。自然而然，同学们都成了小小合唱团的一员。每天的必修课就是唱歌。学着配合，学着使歌声美丽，学着安定。
孩子们由最初的五音不成调，到最后的`自信与默契，这一变化是深谙音乐魔力的马修意料之中的事。正如我们不必过分担忧花苞是否绽放，权可以静待花香四溢。
春洗脱了冬的冷傲和秋的惆怅，当早晨__点钟，太阳高挂，温暖便在心里静静流淌。人们会莫名地抬头仰望蓝天，并不是为了思念，而是一种祈祷或是感激。抑或只是单纯地停驻，去欣赏向来被遗忘的风景。简单使得春天拥有着可以高歌的权力。在孩子们的世界里，快乐显得纯粹。有歌声，微笑便装满胸膛。就像一场春雨后的彩虹，那样自然，又很可贵。
春天似乎有点短暂，来得静悄悄，去得也无影踪。徐志摩先生的那一脍炙人口的诗句———轻轻地我走了，正如我轻轻地来……原来也可以安放在“春天”。学校着火了，学生们安然无恙，这个像是故事的事故却导致了马修的离职。“我盼望着能看见孩子们涌到门口和我道别”，这是马修心底里卑微的愿望。可惜并没有。然而在路的转角，孩子们用他们引以为傲的清脆的歌声铺满了整条街，覆盖了临别时的忧愁。挥动的双手，是在道别，更像是无助的表达，也在宣告着，从此后要独自飞翔。
还在念着“冬天来了，春天还会远吗?”，一转眼，春天已掠过身旁。不经意地，我们竟看见小鸟欢唱、柳枝嫩绿、蝴蝶翩飞……
大学春天的英文作文【七】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
