官方托福满分作文【一】
前不久，有的地方随处可看到“你丑你横穿”“我在天桥对面等着你”之类的话语。网友随即将它拍到网上，这些“文明用语”在网上引起了注意，网友们纷纷点赞。违反交通规则的人也少了不少。这一仗，官方用于就败给了别样用词。
一些官方用于在平常时就容易被人忽视，然而把它转化为别样用词反而会引起大家的注意，这是为什么呢？
一方面和其所处的时代有关。80年代时，条件艰苦，没有人敢把这些略带调侃的用词放到大众里。而且，那个时候，也没有现在一样车来车往。
另一方面，和他们的敢于创新精神有关。现信息时代的`人们，动不动就“萌萌哒”“欧巴，撒拉嘿”亦或者是“蓝瘦，香菇”······在大众创业、万众创新的时代，官方用语就已经被人们淘汰了，现在的人一口一句英语，那简直就是“soeasy”啦！
以此类推，官方用语就已经完败了。那么，别样用词就真的可以替代官方用语吗？
答案就是不！
放眼到国外，他们用的也是英语版的官方用语，但他们的违反行为更是少之又少。看来啊！别样用词在国外也兴不起来呀。
在中国，别样用词相比官方语言，也不是有多大的用处。虽然两者并没有必然的因果关系，但两者都是为了人们的身心健康而产生的。
事实上，官方用语在许多地方仍然使用。没有官方用语的基础，别样用词如何改编？
我们可以拿到别样用词来提醒人们，但不可以以此来误导人们。两者有好也有不好的地方，但从种种数据可以看出，别样用词在大众中更受欢迎。别样用词也只要做到监管有用，责任不留白，我们才能真正挥别官方用语。
官方托福满分作文【二】
Mahatma Gandhi
Gandhi was the peerless precursor of India national independence movement as well as a provident politician with prodigious probity. Grown up in penury, he was a pious posterity of the Indian people and had no prodigal penchants.
Fighting for the perennial independence of India, Gandhi is propped by many followers. He told them to keep placid and proscribed violence which may pervert people, for he knew profoundly, if that prevails, their prestige would be profaned and the movement would fall in plight. As a result, he kept placating his followers by plotting petitions with percussions and pleaded with the British colonists with propriety to accept their plausible proposals. Local governors professed his process permissible, and his minions proliferated.
As Gandhi’s propensity to become independent protruded and his profuse methods of struggle protracted, the colonists were prodded and pensive. They fear that the poise would be broken and fights would pervade. So they prosecuted Gandhi for pilferage of poultries and plunged the plaintiff into the penal jail. The jail keeper was prone to sympathy and made special food provision for Gandhi by pecking the jail wall. Their precious proximity was not perpetuated. Soon the keeper was precluded from touching Gandhi and Gandhi lost his preference.??
A prolific playwright wrote a play about Gandhi with pertinent topic recently. In the prelude of the play he premised that Gandhi was still alive. When the play was on, it precipitated and the perspective of the city’s profile became picturesque.
