我们每一位同学都在不断的成长,在成长的过程中需要鼓励。鼓励会使我们鼓起勇气,奋力向前;鼓励会给我们前进的动力;鼓励会使我们有信心去战胜挫折,最终取得胜利。
鼓励给予我们勇气
在学校中,各式的课程使我们苦恼。有人对于这一科有兴趣就使劲学,对于自己讨厌的科目就少学,出现了偏科现象,我也有偏科现象,我也有偏科的现象,我不喜欢的科,我的成绩也不是很好,父母让我抽出时间找老师补课,每次谈到这个话题,我不是装作没听见就是要看书等,我明知道这是对我好,但是我畏惧老师不敢上前。
在课后,我与我的闺蜜说了,他却说;“不怕,你一定会成功的!”我依然摇头,他瞪着两只大眼睛对我说;“快点去吧,你能行!”我依旧不肯前往。又一次,我再一次考砸了,他走过来,拍了拍我的肩膀说;“怎么了,还不打算去啊?再不去就再没机会了啊!我相信你会成功的,加油!”说着,他把我带到了办公室门前,他却转身走了。我小碎步的走进办公室,找老师问了问题。
我不知道发生了什么,只记得他说的话直至现在,我依然忘不了!
信心是鼓励的产物
在一次阳光体育运动会时,我信心十足的站在了跑道上,迎来了女生800米跑。我当时不知道有多高兴了,因为不与别的班级一起跑,但是出乎我意料的是;才跑完一圈,就听到了本班同学在骂我,但是我没太听清内容,我当时心里想;你们骂吧,我不好好跑了。说到做到,我们班级已经有一个人超过我了,我满不在意。但是说时迟那时快班主任突然来了一句;“拿出实力来,跑给他们看,你是最棒的。”这使我失落的内心再次燃起了火焰,鼓起了勇气,信心十足地向前冲,当时宛如一匹脱缰的野马驰骋在沙场上,最终超越了第一。
我们在成长过程中,不免会有点小的挫折阻碍了我们前进的阻力,因此我们因该从同学、家人、老师的鼓励中获得勇气与信心。冲破昏暗,迎来光明!
生在当下的我,每天过着衣食无忧的幸福生活,她的故事一直在我脑海中回放。还记得当时我和妈妈都被感动得流下了眼泪。与孟佩杰相比,我感到无比的惭愧,有时惹妈妈生气,闲妈妈的话唠叨,买的新衣服也不喜欢……
我要以“百善孝为先”的中华传统美德为学习榜样,做一个谦谦君子,从现在开始改变自己。在父母工作累了的`时候泡一杯清茶,在他们感到烦恼的时候,说一句温暖的话语……我应该向孟佩杰学习,做个孝敬父母的好孩子,不让妈妈生气,好好学习,不辜负父母的期望!
古训:“万般皆下品,唯有读书高”,曾在古代盛行,现在的时代不是不需要这样的古训了,而是在“唯有读书高”这句上,我个人在思想观念上存在一些想法。
当代大学生“上大学存在风险”,不是你上了大学就进入了保险箱,也不是你今后的前程光芒一片,只能说是你为今后谋得更好的前程增加了一个法码罢了。当今社会“就业形势”不是已证了此事了吗?比如,扩招之后,各所大学都在扩招本土及外地生源,好象一夜之间,中国的大地上一下子就都成了高级知识分子似了,什么硕士、博士等等人们都在学历上增长,在学时上有待考究。专科、本科学历的“大学生”好象是小学生水平,在就业市场上好象难谋到理想的职业,现在不是有的大学毕业生在竟聘“卖猪肉”的职位吗?这不就是“上大学存在风险”的真实版本吗?如果你不上大学,只有初中或高中文化水平“卖猪肉”不就可以了吗?何必投入那么多精力、财力,最终还得回到残酷的现实中来与那些生活底层的人们争职位?现如今不得不让我重新审视读大学的风险,这就是我想到的“上大学存在风险”的观点。
初看这是对大学生人生观、价值观、世界观的否定,细想一想,其实不是这样的,从现实生活中的大学生择业上看,我的观点从某种意义上讲是有些道理的。
我个人认为也有的单位重学历,轻水平的也不乏有之。学历层次的递增是件好事,但不能只停留在原有的工作水平上,而是真正能成为学历与自身素质同时提升,更不能在学术上搞“天下学术是一家,你评我我评他,最终评的是一家”上,学术上,搞形式与内容的脱节更不可取。让风险也应存在于学术领域,让真正有学问的`人为祖国出更多的学术精品。
有的学生虽是投入金钱,为的是求得功名,到三至几年求得了博、硕毕业证,有工作单位的还好,回到原有单位会要求相应的待遇。苦了那些还在路上狂热的大学生们。
最让人们担心的是今天的就业形势,那就是大学毕业生遍地开花,有的大学毕业生又重新拿起书本,在向更广更深的知识层面进发,最终能否修成正果,读书风险是否在加大未知。也有的大学生先选择了不理想的就业岗位,先择业后选岗位这是当代大学生的明智性的选择。普通的大学生毕业后就面临失业的大有人在,是现实的无奈还是读大学的风险在加码呢?不得而知。
现在有的大学生虽然大学毕业了,最起码的个人简历都不会书写,更谈不上专业知识能力的潜在危机了,虽说是时代变了,但知识能力没有风险呀,投入越多收益越多吗?多数学校是盲目招生,学生到校后,不能得到良好的教育,读大学生风险不是不存在,而是先投入风险,后收获成功的喜悦。
综上所述,“上大学存在风险”是实实在在存在的,最后让我们的大学生在“风险”中前行,道路虽是曲折的,前途是光明的,让我们伴着国家发展的希望曙光,在人生的决择中,大学生都有一个好的前程、好的归宿。
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
© 2022 zuowencangku.com,All Rights Reserved.