如何应对大学的压力英文作文【一】
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【二】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【三】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【四】
18.列举事实，说明应对海洋石油污染的重要性和紧迫性。
19.物理方法、化学方法和生物方法。 生物方法。
20.最为表程度，说明解决油水合一的问题在清除海洋石油污染过程中的重要性。最为一词体现了说明语言的准确性。
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【五】
在人生这所学校中，挫折是一门必修课。
这门课增加了我们的勇气;增强了我们的意志;坚定了我们的信念;使我们更坚强，更勇敢，更乐观……我有这样的亲身体验。
我爱好舞蹈，喜欢爵士舞。刚学它时，我遇到过许多大大小小的挫折。这些挫折几乎将我打倒，一度我准备放弃舞蹈时，当我心灰意冷时，一次成功的登台演出，使我得到了许多人的好评。我笑了，这次成功使我懂得了挫折的美丽，明白了如果生活中没有挫折，生活就平淡得好似一杯白开水;如果生活中没有挫折，像一望无际的沙漠，没有一点起伏，那么生活又有什么意义呢?
也许你还在摇头，说这些并不能说服你，那么请看贝多芬。贝多芬双耳失聪，要知道，音乐家失去了听觉就像驾驶员失去了眼睛。但他却忍受着病痛的折磨，以一句“我要扼住命运的咽喉，决不让命运使我屈服”激励着自己，继续在音乐领域里奋斗，他创造出不朽名曲《第九交响乐》。这不仅使他的生活有了美妙的旋律，也为全世界喜欢音乐的人们带去了精彩的生活与美的感受。司马迁狱中写《史记》;吴承恩在科学中屡遭挫折，但他并没有放弃，写出了《西游记》;一生不得志生活贫困的蒲松龄创作出了中国著名的文言短篇小说集《聊斋志异》;鲁迅在黑暗势力的迫害下，仍能写出众所周知的《彷徨》《呐喊》……还有全身瘫痪的奥斯特洛夫斯基和他的《钢铁是怎样炼成的》;因患小儿麻痹症而终身残疾的小提琴王子帕尔曼……当这一个个活生生的实例展现在你面前时，你还摇头吗?你还认为挫折仅仅是阻挡你前进的障碍吗?
其实，生活似大海，挫折就像大海中的`波澜，赋予大海以壮丽与神秘;生活如蓝天，挫折如蓝天中的白云，星星点点，却布满天空;生活像一张白纸，挫折则像一支支画笔，为生活这张白纸描绘出美丽的图画……假如你选择了蓝天，就不要渴望风和日丽;假如你选择了陆地，就不要渴望大陆平坦，假如你选择了海洋，就不要渴望一帆风顺。让我们勇敢地面对挫折，生活因为有了挫折而更加精彩。
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【六】
所谓天有不测风云，人有旦夕祸福，生活中既然存在机遇，那也必然会有挑战，没有谁能一帆风顺，所以当新困境降临时需要我们巧妙地应对。
应对，首先需要我们积极面对问题，不论困境还是危机，正视它，面对它，才能找到解决问题的方法，其次才是利用最优策略克服难题。
“应”便是面对问题的过程。孔子厄陈蔡，作《春秋》;屈原放逐，著《离》;左丘失明，厥有《国语》，可见有些灾厄就算是圣贤也难以避免，但圣贤之所以为圣，是因为他们抱有积极的态度正视苦难，若孔子确信仁政难以推行便消极避世，那么句句箴言的《论语》又如何启示后人。可见接受困厄的.豁达态度，给予我们克服它的机会，再高明的对策也建立在面对问题之上。
“对”便是通过行动真正采取有效措施的过程。有了“应”，只是接受了存在问题这一事实，而“对”则能切实的解决问题。于个人而言，宫崎俊先生承受幼年丧母之痛，而《龙猫》这部寄予了温情与陪伴的影片便是他对人生逆境的一次回击，他用实际行动创作一部部经典，是对童年所缺失的爱的一次弥补，同时也将温情与美好带给观影者。于国而言，‘行动’更显重要，2020全面小康计划，通过走访贫困户、深入研究、借鉴国际经验，脱贫攻坚依靠的是切实可靠的方针，并且有条不紊的加以实施，在取得了今日的脱贫的显著成效。
面对新情况，新困难，为求解决问题最有效的方法，“应”与“对”则不能分离，且缺一不可。只接受问题而不施展对策，一切都无济于事，而回避问题本身，对策不过是空谈，毫无针对性可言。
在疫情严峻之际，“应”与“对”的合二为一才取得了抗疫的最佳效果。群体免疫和避之不谈，这类消极面对问题的态度的后果是毁灭性的，而同时未在第一时间采取封城措施，疫情便会迅速蔓延形成燎原之势。可见只有迅速的正视问题，立即采取有效措施，才能从病魔的手中救下数以万计的生命。
结合应与对各自的智慧才是最优策略，带给我们的是面对面对“新情况”时充足的底气与自信。
如何应对大学的压力英文作文【七】
生命，顽强的生命!它就像这只雄鹰，背向蓝天俯看大地，不停地顽强地挥动两只臂膀，在狂风暴雨中飞翔，就像拥有挣脱一切的力量;生命，顽强的生命，它就像这朵小花，不管风吹雨打在大自然中茁壮成长，就像拥有超越平凡的力量。
在生命的崎岖小路上，又有谁一路走来，没有遇到任何坎坷和艰险?然而面对坎坷和艰险的态度却是截然不同，懦弱的人会选择退缩和逃避，其结果被挫折和艰险打倒，让生命暗淡无光;勇敢的人会选择坚强，战胜挫折和艰险，就像拨开云雾见太阳，使生命绽放鲜艳夺目的光彩。
坚强的人，面对挫折和艰难永不低头，使他们的生命绽放出灿烂的花朵，这样的人无论在身边还是在世界上都是屡见不鲜。世界著名的科学家史蒂芬·霍金，虽然病魔把他禁锢在一把轮椅上，长达40年之久，他却身残志不残，克服了残废之躯，成为国际物理界耀眼的超级明星，他坐在轮椅上，解开了宇宙之谜。他不断探索的科学精神和勇敢顽强的人格力量，深深地感染了每一个了解他的人。如果说他的命运是那漆黑的夜空，那么因为他的坚强意志，使得天空变得月光明媚，繁星闪烁;如果说他的命运是那贫瘠的土地，那么因为他的坚强意志，使得土地变得肥沃，繁花似锦，葱葱郁郁。是的，他的成功，说明了坎坷、艰难使得人生变得更加精彩，就像雨后的彩虹放射出灿烂的光辉。
生命的顽强怒放，也体现了人们对疾病、对亡的抗争。特别对我们老年人而言，更是如此，我的邻居也是我的好友她得了“中风”，留下了后遗症，腿脚不听使唤，医生说要多练习走路。她多么热爱生活，多么想活下去!她要顽强与疾病斗争，每天她要走3000米到4000米，她是一只雄鹰，她拥有挣脱一切的力量，她拥有超越平凡的力量。那一天，上午她走了3000米，下午又走了3000米，我遇到她，(此时下午4.30，我说：“别太累了!”她说：“没事!”继续走完了3000米。上3楼回到家，对保姆说给我捶捶腿，保姆说：“好!”她往床上一躺，满脸通红，失去了知觉，保姆大叫：“阿姨不好啦!”此时下午五点钟。噩耗传来，邻居们无不震惊与悲痛，有的失声痛哭。事情过后有人说：“人的生命太脆弱了!”而我认为：她的生命太顽强了，我很难想象她是用怎样的超越自己体能的力量，走完了3000米，又爬上了3楼。虽然她的抗争失败了，但是，她的顽强的精神永放光彩，感动着身边所有的人，她身边的所有的人，都眼含热泪，向她顽强和勇敢精神致敬!
但是，我想生命的怒放是一种精神的追求，因为人毕竟是人，不是神。因此在具体操作上不能超越鲜活的生命的极限，还要实事求是。
