团队合作英文作文大学【一】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
团队合作英文作文大学【二】
我认为曾先生的团队管理学说对管理素质较高、相对年龄较大的团队比较好，对80后为主力的团队似乎可能不太适应。
而且中国人应该有自己的管理模式，及管理思想。是因为深深的了解了团队以及管理的内涵，团队以及管理不是一件简单的事情，说做就能做的！
在21世纪经济高速发展的今天，靠个人的单打独斗是不可能的。团队是新名词，在我国早就有一个篱笆三个桩，一个好汉三个帮。所以我们要发扬这种传统，在这个社会上迅速组建自己的团队。这样才能立于不败之地。
我对此书读后的感觉是这样的：
首先最早的现在团队管理应该是在美国，关于在团队管理方面，我倒觉得日本更具有可学性，是绝对服从性的，所以后来被流传到了日本，被日本学习借鉴，结合日本的文化形成了日本的现代管理理论，虽然管理起源美国，但后来日本在管理作的很好，迫使美国对日本管理刮目相看，形成了两国理论，中国的确应该好好借鉴！！
现在日本和美国的管理已经来到中国，我觉得既然已经来到中国了，就需要这些团队管理和中国的传统文化相结合，形成中国人自己的软队管理，因为各种原因的差异，我认为中国照搬国外的是在国内行不通的！就像基本原理需要结合具体实践一样。
然而中国人和日本人，美国人，文化差别真的很大的。
如果我工作的.时候有可能作为一名管理者的话就这样来实践，而《中国式团队》正好提供了一面镜子。用来反思那些欧美以及日本理论，只有这样才能看得更清楚。
我认为我还算是一个比较容易吸收个中理念的人，在对任何理论不了解前都不排斥而去熟悉，我知道任何理论或者概念都有特定的局限性，如果到时候我真的做了一名管理者，只有综合分析，然后个别实施，到时候才能够形成自己的管理习惯。
其次我认为中国式管理现在是学术热点了，因为过了那个单纯学习的阶段了，中国真的是有特色的国家，我感觉现在有种理念比较流行了，就是把孔子的学说融入到管理中，关于孔子的学说有着悠久的历史，积淀的文化，那只是一种尝试，就像百家讲坛中于丹教授所说：当我们在上班的时候会用儒家的思想，修身齐家平天下。而下班呢，我们又会选择用道家的思想，当我们看待那些，再去在处理事物的时候，要宣扬法家的思想。我们中华民族百家争鸣，但却从未发生过像百家争斗的事件，现在摆在我们面前的却是百家融合、借鉴发展的情景，而我们中国人对待那些思想都是不是笃信的，应该都是各取所需，我觉得这就是我们中国人的聪明。
然而不同的市场，造就了不同的团队形式与内涵！也许只有适应市场的团队才可以得到真正的成功吧！
现在应该可以说欧洲的市场以及管理是发展相对成熟的，再与中国国内相比较，感觉就相差得有点远了，当然中国国内的环境与国外的环境的差距也有距离。
不管怎么样，中国式的团队，也肯定有其优势所在的。只要积极的去学习先进的管理以及其精神，在我们本来的基础上，再不断发展与完善，中国国内的团队的发展应该会是很好的！一切都需要用心去追求，去努力，需要智慧去运用，去超越国外的一些团队！
最后，相信自己，相信伙伴！因为它解释的是一种团队人员之间的信任和互助！
团队合作英文作文大学【三】
团队合作英文作文大学【四】
李慧波主编的《团队精神》读过有段时间了，书中所列举的生动事例，所阐述的观点不时在我脑海里浮现出来，使我更加明白一个道理：一个人如果没有团队精神将难成大事，一个企业如果没有团队精神将成为一盘散沙、无所作为，只有发扬团队精神，才能创造辉煌。
书中描述了张瑞敏领导的海尔团队发挥团队精神、集中力量克服难关的生动事例。1994年4月5日下午两点，一个德国经销商打来电话要求海尔必须在两天内发货，否则订单自动失效。两天内发货意味着当天下午所要的货物必须装船，而此刻正是星期五下午两点，如果按海关、商检等有关部门下午五点下班来计算的话，时间只有三个小时，按照一般程序做到这一切几乎是不可能的。如何将不可能变为可能？此时，海尔人优良的团队精神显示巨大的能量。他们采取齐头并进的方式，调货的调货、报关的报关、联系船期的联系船期，全员全身心地投入到工作中，抓紧每一分钟，确保每一个环节都顺利通过。当天下午五点半，这位经销商接到了来自海尔货物发出的消息时，他非常吃惊，从吃惊再转为感激，并破例向海尔写了感谢信，《《团队精神》读书笔记800字》。
从这个事例不难看出，海尔集团神奇般的崛起和茁壮成长，不仅仅得益于他的统军人物张瑞敏，还得益于张瑞敏率领下的整个团队中的每位员工的努力。海尔把自己的价值观定义为：“人的价值高于物的价值，共同价值高于个体价值，共同协作的价值高于单干的价值”。这种价值观不正是团队精神的生动写照吗！
书中还列举了韩国三星集团、我国蒙牛集团等著名企业快速发展崛起的事例，无一不是依靠团队精神、依靠企业凝聚力发展起来的。
再看看我们春德小学辉煌的业绩，成绩的取得，离不开学校领导和全体师生的拼搏努力，离不开学校上下团结一心、共同奋斗的协作精神。众人拾柴火焰高，人心齐，泰山移！春德小学特有的团队精神，谱写出了一曲曲团结奋进的辉煌乐章。今后不论遇到什么困难和险阻，只要我们发扬团队精神，万众一心，就没有过不去的“火焰山”！
团队合作英文作文大学【五】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
团队合作英文作文大学【六】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
团队合作英文作文大学【七】
我认为曾先生的团队管理学说对管理素质较高、相对年龄较大的团队比较好，对80后为主力的团队似乎可能不太适应。
而且中国人应该有自己的管理模式，及管理思想。是因为深深的了解了团队以及管理的内涵，团队以及管理不是一件简单的事情，说做就能做的！
在21世纪经济高速发展的今天，靠个人的单打独斗是不可能的。团队是新名词，在我国早就有一个篱笆三个桩，一个好汉三个帮。所以我们要发扬这种传统，在这个社会上迅速组建自己的团队。这样才能立于不败之地。
我对此书读后的感觉是这样的：首先最早的现在团队管理应该是在美国，关于在团队管理方面，我倒觉得日本更具有可学性，是绝对服从性的，所以后来被流传到了日本，被日本学习借鉴，结合日本的文化形成了日本的现代管理理论，虽然管理起源美国，但后来日本在管理作的很好，迫使美国对日本管理刮目相看，形成了两国理论，中国的确应该好好借鉴！！
现在日本和美国的管理已经来到中国，我觉得既然已经来到中国了，就需要这些团队管理和中国的传统文化相结合，形成中国人自己的软队管理，因为各种原因的差异，我认为中国照搬国外的是在国内行不通的！就像基本原理需要结合具体实践一样。然而中国人和日本人，美国人，文化差别真的很大的。
如果我工作的时候有可能作为一名管理者的话就这样来实践，而《中国式团队》正好提供了一面镜子。用来反思那些欧美以及日本理论，只有这样才能看得更清楚。我认为我还算是一个比较容易吸收个中理念的人，在对任何理论不了解前都不排斥而去熟悉，我知道任何理论或者概念都有特定的局限性，如果到时候我真的做了一名管理者，只有综合分析，然后个别实施，到时候才能够形成自己的管理习惯。
其次我认为中国式管理现在是学术热点了，因为过了那个单纯学习的阶段了，中国真的是有特色的国家，我感觉现在有种理念比较流行了，就是把孔子的学说融入到管理中，关于孔子的学说有着悠久的历史，积淀的文化，那只是一种尝试，就像百家讲坛中于丹教授所说：当我们在上班的`时候会用儒家的思想，修身齐家平天下。而下班呢，我们又会选择用道家的思想，当我们看待那些，再去在处理事物的时候，要宣扬法家的思想。我们中华民族百家争鸣，但却从未发生过像百家争斗的事件，现在摆在我们面前的却是百家融合、借鉴发展的情景，而我们中国人对待那些思想都是不是笃信的，应该都是各取所需，我觉得这就是我们中国人的聪明。
然而不同的市场，造就了不同的团队形式与内涵！也许只有适应市场的团队才可以得到真正的成功吧！现在应该可以说欧洲的市场以及管理是发展相对成熟的，再与中国国内相比较，感觉就相差得有点远了，当然中国国内的环境与国外的环境的差距也有距离。
不管怎么样，中国式的团队，也肯定有其优势所在的。只要积极的去学习先进的管理以及其精神，在我们本来的基础上，再不断发展与完善，中国国内的团队的发展应该会是很好的！一切都需要用心去追求，去努力，需要智慧去运用，去超越国外的一些团队！最后，相信自己，相信伙伴！因为它解释的是一种团队人员之间的信任和互助！
团队合作英文作文大学【八】
最近拜读了李慧波的《团队精神》一书，该书围绕团结协作论述了团队建设的好坏对于领导者和员工意味着什么；高效团队是如何构建和运作的；团队成员何以才能相互信赖、协作和进步；团队中的大多数人如何激励；少数人如何引导；怎样将团队培育成学习型组织等主要内容。
书中引用了大量生动、具体的事例来进行诉说并论证团队精神的重要性。例如书中描述了张瑞敏领导的海尔团队发挥团队精神、集中力量克服难关的生动事例。从这个事例看出，海尔集团神奇般的崛起和茁壮成长，不仅仅得益于他的统军人物张瑞敏，还得益于张瑞敏率领下的整个团队中的每位员工的努力。海尔把自己的价值观定义为：“人的价值高于物的价值，共同价值高于个体价值，共同协作的价值高于单干的价值”。这种价值观不正是团队精神的生动写照吗！
书中还列举了韩国三星集团、我国蒙牛集团等著名企业快速发展崛起的事例，无一不是依靠团队精神、依靠企业凝聚力发展起来的。众所周知，1+1是等于2的。那么，为什么说1+1大于2呢？因为这其中的每个1都是充满团队精神的1，如果一个集体、一个机关、一个团队，我们中的每一个分子都充满团队精神，那么，这个集体、这个机关、这个团队就一定是个和谐的团队。这样的团队工作起来就一定能够取得事半功倍的成果。这难道不是1+1大于2吗？
团队精神就是公司上下精诚团结、目标一致、协同共进。就如航行于大海的巨舰，有智慧舰长的正确指挥，有勇敢船员的协同配合，在这艘巨舰上每一个人都发挥着重要的作用，凝聚成劈波斩浪的巨大动力。一个成功的企业，只要具备了这种精神，就能在激烈的竟争中长盛不衰。一根筷子容易弯，十根筷子折不断，这就是团队精神重要性力量的直观表现，也是团队精神重要之所在团队精神的最高境界―凝聚力。全体成员的向心力、凝聚力是从松散的个人集合走向团队最重要的标志。
书中所列举的.生动事例，所阐述的观点使我更加明白一个道理：一个人如果没有团队精神将难成大事，一个企业如果没有团队精神将成为一盘散沙、无所作为，只有发扬团队精神，才能创造辉煌。
